One of those very important
topics for every entrance exam and at the same time a bit
nebulous topic too
Theorem 1: Prime
numbers are odd, except for 2, and they have exactly two factors,
the number and 1 itself.
You would be wondering, why I
have started with this, but whole prime number theory is based on
this only.
From here, I will formulate
something, which I use excessively in problem solving !. But
first lets solve an example. This question is taken from My quant
problem set III, the link of which can
be found," free material for cat".
Example 1: Let a,b,c,d
be distinct prime numbers satisfying :
2a+3b+5c+7d=162
11a+7b+5c+4d=162
Given that abcd=k. Find the number of distinct values of
k?
A) 0
B) 1
C) 2
D) 3
E) 4
How we go about this? We were
told in school, that n variables need n equations, but we have
n-2 here. A road-block? No, a call to think deeply. Just see how
we can reduce variables or increase equations.
We subtract the two equations
and get 9a+4b=3d => 4b=3(d-3a)
RHS
is divisible by 3, so should be LHS and
therefore b=3
put this in the initial
equations, and we are sure the max value of a can be =7 (i leave
it to u to figure out how, a hint: all prime numbers are
distinct, and we have used 3, we are left with the two smallest
as 2 and 5).
Back again 3a=d-4=>d=3a+4
gives us (a,d)=(5,19),(11,37).. but clealry the second set wont
work, very large values. We found the set, just by using the
constraint, all are distinct primes and 3 has been
used.
so we have b=3,a=5 d=19, there
is no further need to go as we need the no of values of k which
will obviously be 1. But for the sake of completeness we can
check c=2
Seems like a marathon, but no
its a 3-4 minute problem, once you start doing what I want you to
!
Now, if you have understood
this concept, you should be able to get the practice problem,
which is taken from one of the simcats.
Practice Problem
1 A boy spends Rs. 81 in buying some pens and pencils.
If a pen costs Rs.7 and a pencil Rs 3, What is the ratio of pens
to pencils when the maximum number of pens are purchased such
that no extra money is given to the shopkeeper?
A) 3:2
B) 2:1
C) 5:4
D) 7:2
E) none of these
The next concept which I am going to take up is Prime
squares:)
Theorem 2 : All prime squares ( p>3) are of the form
6k+1, i.e , for all
primes p>3.
Lets try to prove this, any three numbers (p-1)p(p+1) will be
divisible by 6. but as p is a prime greater than 3, it would
neither be divisible by 2 nor 3, hence so
.
Some purists will say, that as p is a prime greater than 3, then,
yupp
I agree, but 24k+1 becomes cumbersome to handle sometimes. The
proof is simple again, p is odd so both will be divisible by 2
and one by 4. also one of them by 3. hence
so
But, I have always used 6k+1, may be just used to it. You may
pick the one that suites you.
Kindly note, this is a necessary condition not a sufficient one,
means all prime square will be of form 6k+1, but all no of 6k+1
cant be prime square
Lets handle our next example based on this.
Example 2 : Find the number of primes p, such that
is also a prime?
A quick check will tell 2 does not satisfy and 3 does.
now we check for higher primes
hence divisible by 3, not a
prime
So, only one prime p=3 . We are done here!
Post Comments